Tagged : Cristian Pop-Eleches

Do Home PCs Have a Negative Impact on Student Achievement?

The answer to that ques­tion is a big yes if you believe the results of a large study car­ried out by Pro­fes­sors Mala­mud of the Uni­ver­sity of Chicago and his col­lab­o­ra­tor, Cris­t­ian Pop-Eleches of the Uni­ver­sity of Colum­bia. This is not the first time that research has pointed to PCs in the home hav­ing a neg­a­tive effect on stu­dent aca­d­e­mic achieve­ment. I read about the study last month but was prompted to com­ment on it by Ran­dall Stross’ very inter­est­ing arti­cle in the NY Times this week.

The basic find­ing of these mul­ti­ple stud­ies is that stu­dent aca­d­e­mic achieve­ment declines after the intro­duc­tion of a PC and broad­band con­nec­tion in their home. Dis­turbingly, the impact is most pro­nounced with chil­dren liv­ing in lower income homes i.e. the very group you would intu­itively think would ben­e­fit most.

In my opin­ion, while the effect may be real (The sam­ple sizes are very large and across mul­ti­ple geo­gra­phies) the con­clu­sions being drawn are dan­ger­ously wrong.

To accept the find­ings of the study you also have to accept the log­i­cal counter con­clu­sion that low income stu­dents would be bet­ter off aca­d­e­m­i­cally if they were not dis­tracted by hav­ing an Inter­net con­nected PC at home. Every fiber of my body tells me that this con­clu­sion can­not be correct.

Hav­ing wres­tled with this con­tra­dic­tion since read­ing about the study back in May I have arrived at my own con­clu­sions. The prob­lem with the study find­ings is bound up in what is being mea­sured i.e. aca­d­e­mic achievement.

We live in a soci­ety and increas­ingly face a future where the PC and the Inter­net have become the basic tools of eco­nomic value cre­ation. In the 17th cen­tury you needed to know how to join wood or bend iron. Today you need to know how to access and inter­pret infor­ma­tion, how to draw you own con­clu­sions, how to syn­the­size new ideas and how to com­mu­ni­cate those ideas to an increas­ingly dis­trib­uted set of collaborators.

In my opin­ion the con­clu­sions being drawn from this study say far more about foun­da­tional prob­lems in our aca­d­e­mic sys­tem; what is taught and how we assess student’s readi­ness to enter a 21st cen­tury work­force. It is largely the case (Excep­tions do exist) that the pub­lic K-12 sys­tem is still designed to turn out work­ers for a 19th cen­tury indus­trial econ­omy. We teach kids how to learn facts, be able to fol­low instruc­tion and to respect author­ity. If you are lucky enough to come from a mid­dle or upper income fam­ily you can of course obtain a much more pro­gres­sive and tech­nol­ogy enabled edu­ca­tion in the pri­vate sector.

What these stud­ies tell us is that the affected stu­dents got worse at doing stan­dard­ized tests. I would ask so what? We already know that fam­ily income level has a pro­found effect on stan­dard­ized test­ing scores which impacts the long term eco­nomic poten­tial of chil­dren from these envi­ron­ments. The prob­lem isn’t the kids or the PC the prob­lem is an edu­ca­tion sys­tem which is has an inbuilt biased against them.

That stan­dard­ized test­ing has become the sin­gle deter­mi­nant of aca­d­e­mic achieve­ment bor­ders on the crim­i­nal. When I hire tal­ent for my busi­ness I am not inter­ested in their stan­dard­ized test scores. I want to know if they can think cre­atively, solve prob­lems, com­mu­ni­cate their ideas effec­tively and are smart enough to know that life is about learn­ing all the time. These stud­ies do not tell us any­thing about how access to PCs and the Inter­net might pos­si­bly improve or develop these skills. It might just be the case that col­lab­o­ra­tive prob­lem solv­ing with a net­work of friends on Face­Book is a far more valu­able eco­nomic life skill than leran­ing to remem­ber the who was the 33rd Pres­i­dent of the United States.

I really do believe that these stud­ies are dan­ger­ous. The dan­ger is that they will become an imped­i­ment to pro­grams which are focused on clos­ing a very impor­tant dig­i­tal divide that exists between rich and poor fam­i­lies and between rich and poor nations. I can’t help believ­ing that a sim­i­lar research project in the 17th cen­tury would have found that hav­ing a ham­mer, saw, wood and nails in the home was dis­tract­ing chil­dren from their reli­gious stud­ies. Pause for a sec­ond before you con­clude that this is a ridicu­lous analogy.